[1] ai.viXra.org:2611.0001 [pdf] submitted on 2026-11-01 21:47:15
Authors: Warren D. Smith
Comments: 49 Pages. [CLAUDE was used]
I — "six-foundations theorem." The metric isn't the only possible basis for Riemannian/Lorentzian geometry. The Riemann tensor, connection, Ricci-Weyl pair, and – in 4D – Lanczos tensor or superpotential paired with Ricci, each determine the geometry. The proof – an algorithm integrating the geodesic-deviation equation outward from a seed point – was implemented as a check. Both Lanczos-based foundations are strictly richer than the metric. Goal: new foundations for differential geometry, physics.
II — extra 4D-only beauty. The 4D real-valued Riemann tensor Rabcd admits two duals, one for each antisymmetric index-pair. The complex numbers ℂ extend the reals ℝ by adjoining i=√-1;bicomplexes ℂ⊗ℂ≅ℂ⊕ℂ extend ℂ with another √-1 symbol. Build ℂ⊗ℂ directly on ℝ by adjoining two commuting special symbols i⃖ and i⃗ obeying
III — combines both. Part I's reconstructions, since linear, accept II's complexified curvatures to produce 4D metrics with extra bicomplex imaginary parts. Reconstructing de Sitter universe from bicomplexified Riemann yields a bicomplex metric with anti-de Sitter as its ⅱ⃡ imaginary part. We call this mysterious component the "shadow metric" despite not always being a metric. Nontrivial Kottler black hole metric shadows are not altered-parameter Kottlers. This process automatically associates three extra bicomplex-imaginary parts with any 4-metric; Ricci, Lanczos, and Weyl tensors effectively simplify to ordinary-complex (just one imaginary part); Bel-Robinson and traceless-Ricci tensors remain pure-real. Riemann's other two (i⃖ and i⃗) components automatically carry the ADM "3+1 time slicing" Einstein field equation reformulation's "momentum constraint." (Confirmation: This lattermost correspondence was already in the 1+3 literature.)Goal: speculatively this provides the natural framework for unifying gravity with quantum field theories.
Also II.12 proves that C4 Lanczos superpotentials don't exist on a 2-parameter family of 5D manifolds. Apparently they generically exist exactly in 4D.
Category: Geometry