Mathematical Physics |
Authors: Pedro A. Kubitschek Homem de Carvalho
This work begins with a simple question: could what we describe as translation and force actually be the local manifestation of a fundamentally angular dynamics? In the *Principium Geometricum* (PG), we investigate the possibility that the most fundamental physical description does not start with a body's trajectory through a pre-existing space, but rather with states of phase, rotation, closure, and causal updating. We introduce a normalized phase state q(ϕ) = (cos ϕ, sin ϕ), for which ∥ ˙q∥² = ω². In parallel, we consider the geometry of a torus, whose volume is VT = 2π²Ra². In the reduced geometric case where R = a = r, we have VT = 2π²r³. These two structures suggest the quantity IT ≡ VT 2π² ∥ ˙q∥² = r³ω². We propose investigating the conservation of IT for orbital states associated with the same global source. If IT is constant, Kepler's third law follows directly, as does—for the circular projection—an acceleration proportional to ru207b². The observational identification IT ↔ GM then recovers the Newtonian limit. This result does not constitute a microscopic derivation of gravity. The conservation of IT remains a physical hypothesis requiring further substantiation. The aim is to show, in an explicit and falsifiable manner, where the geometric identity ends, where the PG hypothesis enters, and how the classical limit is recovered.
Comments: 9 Pages. (Note by ai.viXra.org Admin: Title and abstract MUST BE in English!)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-08-16 19:32:57
Unique-IP document downloads: 35 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.