Relativity and Cosmology

Is a Black Hole a Neutron Star? A Finite-Density Core Hypothesis

Authors: Arieh Sher

Black holes are strongly supported observationally by stellar and gas dynamics, gravitational wave detections, and horizon-scale imaging. Their classical mathematical descriptions, however, contain singularities whose physical interpretation remains an open foundational issue. This paper examines a phenomenological alternative in which gravitational collapse terminates in a finite-density, rotating, neutron-star-like core rather than an infinite-density singularity. A limiting density ρmax = 7.8 × 1017 kgm−3 is adopted as a working hypothesis, not as a consequence of General Relativity (GR) or of an established neutron-star equation of state. The resulting core radius is compared with the Schwarzschild and Kerr horizon radii. In the non-rotating approximation, the condition Rn = 2GM/c2 gives a model-dependent horizon crossing mass of approximately 4.86M⊙ and radius 14.35 km. Rotation is treated with Kerr geometry, and Cygnus X-1 and PSR J1903+0327 are used as illustrative cases. The conventionalneutron-star stability limit, obtained from the Tolman—Oppenheimer—Volkoff (TOV) equationsand an equation of state, is kept conceptually separate from the proposed horizon criterion. The paper also discusses the historical compact-object mass gap and the implications of GW230529.

Comments: 8 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-10-06 00:01:07

Unique-IP document downloads: 3 times

ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.