Astrophysics |
Authors: Eduardo Rodolfo Borrego Moreno
We present a consolidated rheological framework for the Cosmological Dissipative Residual (CDR), a single effective medium proposed to underlie both dark-energy—like and dark-matter— like phenomenology. Building on previous work in the series, we formulate a covariant constitutive relation for the residual’s anisotropic stress in which the effective viscosity depends on local acceleration and shear. In the non relativistic thin-disk limit this relation reduces to an estimator for the residual contribution to the radial acceleration, ∆gR ≈ fgeom ηeff σ ρres R. with a geometric factor fgeom ≈ 3.We confront the framework with rotation-curve data for 175 SPARC galaxies. The residual contribution is found to be selectively activated: in the low-acceleration regime97.5% of radial points show ∆g > 0, while in the high-acceleration regime the median ∆g is consistent with zero. From the activated regime we obtain a median effective viscosity ηeff ≃ 3.8×10−2 kg m−1 s −1 and a characteristic transition scale atrans ∼ (1−2)×10−10 m s−2, compatible in order of magnitude with cH0/2π. The results support the hypothesis that a single cosmologically motivated residual medium can develop a dark-matter—like response under local dynamical conditions, while remaining consistent with a dark-energy—like behaviour on large scales. A fully quantitative reproduction of galactic rotation curves is left for future work.
Comments: 9 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-08-27 20:56:02
Unique-IP document downloads: 20 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.