Quantum Physics |
Authors: Lluis Eriksson
A balanced ordered loop of retained Hamiltonians generates a second-order geometric Hamiltonian. We solve its higher-rank action problem and determine what remains when the order record is erased. For every matrix dimension and every number of kicks `m >= 3`, a gauge-invariant operator action obeys a sharp, dimension-free polygonal bound on the spectral diameter of the geometric Hamiltonian; regular two-level polygons attain the constant in every dimension. A target-sensitive Hilbert--Schmidt companion bound is controlled by the trace norm and has equality exactly for sign-paired nonzero spectra. These laws yield exact diamond-norm ceilings with a physical state witness. For a uniformly forgotten order, we derive an exact `1/12` commutator-frame covariance. The resulting reversal-symmetric random-unitary product converges in diamond norm at rate `O(n^-1)` to a GKLS frame Laplacian whose fixed algebra is the joint commutant of the pair commutators. A tetrahedral Pauli architecture gives exact primitive depolarization with gap `64/3`. Finally, fixed laboratory time `T` and bounded kick amplitude `Lambda` impose a sharp curvature ceiling proportional to `T^2 Lambda^2/n`; maintaining nonzero holonomy requires `Lambda=Omega(sqrt(n))`. Exact symbolic and deterministic numerical certificates accompany the paper.
Comments: 12 pages, 1 figure. Sharp qudit action laws, exact 1/12 covariance, O(n^-1) GKLS diffusion and a sqrt(n) clock barrier.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2026-08-10 16:16:46
Unique-IP document downloads: 26 times
ai.Vixra.org is a AI assisted e-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. ai.Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.